ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00020245
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | A healthcare assistant | A hospital |
Representatives | Self | Local Management |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 77 of the Employment Equality Act, 1998 | CA-00026668-001 | 18/02/2019 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under the Industrial Relations Acts | CA-00026668-002 | 18/02/2019 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1969 | CA-00026668-003 | 18/02/2019 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 28/05/2019
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, and/or Section 79 of the Employment Equality Acts, 1998 - 2015, and/or Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts 1969 following the referral of the complaint(s) to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint(s) and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint(s).
Background:
The complainant is a healthcare assistant employed by a recruitment agency and would carry out her duties for a number of clients as and when required. The agency would inform the Complainant where and when her services would be required and would be responsible for paying her wages and managing her employment. The Complainant commenced employment with the recruitment agency on 04/04/2018. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
Whilst working on the Respondent site (a hospital) the Complainant alleges that she was touched in an inappropriate manner in the region of her buttocks by another health care assistant, a male. The Complainant informed her assailant that there was no need for him to touch her in this region of her body and informed him that touching was the main ingredient for assault. Later, while the Complainant was in the kitchen area the same male employee entered the kitchen area and touched her on her shoulder and said hi. The Complainant informed the male member of staff that touching her without her consent was inappropriate. The Complainant when speaking to the Director of Nursing at the end of her shift suggested that more training was possibly required. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Director of Nursing during a conversation with the Complainant at the end of her shift made enquiries of the Complainant on how she would like to see the matter handled and further enquired if the Complainant had spoken to any other member of staff in relation to these incidents. The Director of Nursing also asked the Complainant if she wanted to speak to anyone in the agency who had arranged for her to work there, the Complainant said no and felt that she had dealt with the matter, she was only letting the Director of Nursing know about the incident, she did not want anything done. The Director of Nursing states that the Complainant was not making a formal complaint, she just wanted her to know about the incident. |
Findings and Conclusions:
The incident in question happened on a night shift 27th/28th June 2018, the Complainant reported the matter to the Director of Nursing on 28th June at 8.10am. Section 77 (5) of the Employment Equality Act 1998 clearly states the following: “(5) Subject to subsection (6), a claim for redress in respect of discrimination or victimisation may not be referred under this section after the end of the period of 6 months from the date of the occurrence or, as the case may require, the most recent occurerrence of the act of discrimination or victimisation to which the case relates”. The complaint has not been made to the Workplace Relations Commission within the cognizable period specified within the Act, I have no alternative but to deem the complaint as not being well founded. Complaints CA-00026668-002 & CA-00026668-003 have both been referred under the Industrial Relations Act. As the Respondent in this case is not the Complainant’s employer there is no case to be answered by this Respondent. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Acts, 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
As outlined above. |
Dated: 29/07/19
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Key Words:
|